Most governance programs are built around a single question: what should we keep, and for how long. That question matters, but it’s only half the job. The
Ask most organizations with an IG program if they have governance over their information, and the answer is yes. There’s a policy. There’s a retention schedule. There’s a framework, usually well written,
A retention schedule is only as defensible as the decisions behind it. Most organizations focus significant effort on defining retention rules. Categories are mapped, legal
ARMA InfoNEXT 2026 delivered. Three days in Phoenix brought strong conversations, meaningful engagement, and a clear signal. The industry is moving beyond policy. The focus is now
Most retention schedules are designed to be consistent. Categories are defined centrally. Legal and regulatory requirements are mapped carefully. The goal is clear: similar information
A retention schedule can be well designed, carefully maintained, and fully aligned with legal and regulatory requirements. And still not be applied. This is the point where
Technology is changing quickly. The role of information governance professionals is changing with it. For many years, information governance and records management programs focused primarily
Executive sponsors typically frame orchestration in broad, outcome-oriented terms: These objectives are directionally clear. What is often missing is the connective tissue between strategy and daily execution. Operational momentum
ARMA InfoCon 2025 marked a major milestone: 70 years of advancing the practice and profession of information governance. LexShift was honored to participate in this
LexShift LLC, the company that features the MosaIQ suite of products, will be making a big splash at ARMA’s InfoCon 2025 this coming October 19